House on Fire
- sombre
- intense
Sombre, kinetic, measured drama / biography, grounded in texture. Nihilistic, intimate, measured, hand-scored across twelve axes of taste.
How every film is hand-scored →In the 50s, the complicated life of a popular writer who must share his life with his family, his numerous mistresses and his work
Our read · House on Fire (1986) reads as a sombre, kinetic, grounded drama · biography · literary entry — measured in intensity, intimate in scope, measured in temperature, nihilistic in outlook. Hand-scored on twelve axes of taste — mood, pacing, weirdness, hope, stakes, humour, reality, density, warmth, auteur, intensity, and era — with a derived palette drawn from its dominant cinematography.
More info & search links
The shape of House on Fire
What watching it is actually like.
“You want a tempestuous Japanese drama of a celebrated writer torn between family duty and passionate affairs.”
Skip it tonight — Skip if complex marital affairs, lust, and long domestic sagas will drain you.
The reading.
Each axis is hand-scored — not derived from votes or genre averages. The marker shows where this film sits; the gradient fill uses the film's own cinematography palette.
Eight films that read most like this one.
Closeness in the twelve-axis space — how the film actually reads, not “people also liked.”
Discussion
What does your Movie DNA look like?
Rate a few films you've seen. We map your taste across the same twelve axes and find the films you'll actually want to watch tonight.
Calibrate yourself